The Lies of Locke Lamora
Overall, the group liked this one. Below are the notes I was able to type during the discussion. Sorry, but I’m not a particularly fast/good typist so these notes are more than just a little rough.
Michele: Back-story used for world/society-building
Ian: society doesn’t seem sustainable
Michele: thrill-ride goes down for quite a ways, hard to image
Mark: “until Jean comes”
Lindsey: is the confidence game really good or just billed that way?
Michele: Locke is smart thief, plans it out.
Lindsey: don’t really care about the money
Michele: wants the money to complete the major con of the book
Mark: But only wants the money to help get revenge on whoever killed his friends
Michele: climbing down the outside the building on the ivy, another man climbs out…
Lindsey: liked how that wasn’t wacky hi-jinks
Mark: disagreed, totally wacky hi-jinks
Lindsey: planning ahead impressive in how Locke anticipates broad specturm of things that could go wrong
Michelle: you don’t mind the white, fluffy buns?
Ian: no, I can handle white, fluffy buns.
Michelle: “until Jean comes”
Ian: distracting # of characters being all named
Michele: all characters come back
Lindsey: Thiefmaker not important as a character, just sets the scene.
Michelle: Also not a lot of info on other characters (e.g. Bug just appears); did he even meet Father Chains?
Mark: No
Lindsey & Michele: Yes, maybe
Ian: something about beginning doesn’t seem right
Mark: Locke being so bloody special so earlier
Ian: not much introspection, basically a “dis-go” book (dis-go here, dis-go there)
Lindesy: 2nd book has more introspection, wasn’t sure she entirely liked that, used to previous book’s voice
Ian: odd descriptions, doesn’t go into details I want
Lindsey + Michele: he does but you haven’t read far enough to get to it; almost too much description we frequentally skip over it
Ian: lot of description, hard time connecting & concept of Father Chains & temple
Lindsey: liked it better 2nd time, helped having a passing familiarity with it
Ian: felt like needed notebook to track who people are
Everybody else: not really
Ian: where’s the tension?
Michele: in whether or not Locke will pull everything off
Mark: and the Grey King plot line that you haven’t gotten to.
This entry was posted in Book Group and tagged 2009, MBDG, October. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.
October 2009 Book Discussion
The Lies of Locke Lamora
Overall, the group liked this one. Below are the notes I was able to type during the discussion. Sorry, but I’m not a particularly fast/good typist so these notes are more than just a little rough.
Michele: Back-story used for world/society-building
Ian: society doesn’t seem sustainable
Michele: thrill-ride goes down for quite a ways, hard to image
Mark: “until Jean comes”
Lindsey: is the confidence game really good or just billed that way?
Michele: Locke is smart thief, plans it out.
Lindsey: don’t really care about the money
Michele: wants the money to complete the major con of the book
Mark: But only wants the money to help get revenge on whoever killed his friends
Michele: climbing down the outside the building on the ivy, another man climbs out…
Lindsey: liked how that wasn’t wacky hi-jinks
Mark: disagreed, totally wacky hi-jinks
Lindsey: planning ahead impressive in how Locke anticipates broad specturm of things that could go wrong
Michelle: you don’t mind the white, fluffy buns?
Ian: no, I can handle white, fluffy buns.
Michelle: “until Jean comes”
Ian: distracting # of characters being all named
Michele: all characters come back
Lindsey: Thiefmaker not important as a character, just sets the scene.
Michelle: Also not a lot of info on other characters (e.g. Bug just appears); did he even meet Father Chains?
Mark: No
Lindsey & Michele: Yes, maybe
Ian: something about beginning doesn’t seem right
Mark: Locke being so bloody special so earlier
Ian: not much introspection, basically a “dis-go” book (dis-go here, dis-go there)
Lindesy: 2nd book has more introspection, wasn’t sure she entirely liked that, used to previous book’s voice
Ian: odd descriptions, doesn’t go into details I want
Lindsey + Michele: he does but you haven’t read far enough to get to it; almost too much description we frequentally skip over it
Ian: lot of description, hard time connecting & concept of Father Chains & temple
Lindsey: liked it better 2nd time, helped having a passing familiarity with it
Ian: felt like needed notebook to track who people are
Everybody else: not really
Ian: where’s the tension?
Michele: in whether or not Locke will pull everything off
Mark: and the Grey King plot line that you haven’t gotten to.